Arizona Collection Laws

What are my rights and liabilities regarding debt in Arizona?

Read full question
Bill's Answer: Bills.com Resident Expert

A collection agent or law firm that owns a collection account is a creditor. A creditor has several legal means of collecting a debt. But before the creditor can start, the creditor must go to court to receive a judgment. See the Bills.com resource Served Summons and Complaint to learn more about this process.

The court may decide to grant a judgment to the creditor. A judgment is a declaration by a court that the creditor has the legal right to demand a wage garnishment, a levy on the debtor's bank accounts, and a lien on the debtor's property. A creditor that is granted a judgment is called a "judgment-creditor." Which of these tools the creditor will use depends on the circumstances. We discuss each of these remedies below.

Wage Garnishment

The most common method used by judgment-creditors to enforce judgments is wage garnishment, in which a judgment creditor would contact the debtor's employer and require the employer to deduct a certain portion of the debtor's wages each pay period and send the money to the creditor. However, several states, including Texas, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and South Carolina, do not allow wage garnishment for the enforcement of most judgments. In several other states, such as New Hampshire, wage garnishment is not the "preferred" method of judgment enforcement because, although possible, it is a tedious and time consuming process for creditors.

In most states, creditors are allowed to garnish between 10% and 25% of your wages, with the percentage allowed being determined by each state.

Garnishment of Social Security benefits or pensions for consumer debt is not allowed under federal law. Garnishment is allowed for child support under Arizona Title 33, Chapter 8, Article 2 33-1131. Definition; wages; salary; compensation.

In Arizona, wage garnishment is allowed under Arizona Title 12, Chapter 9, Article 4.1 12-1598. If the judgment-creditor is aware of the debtor's place of employment, it may seek wage garnishment.

Under federal law, the garnishment applies to 25% of the debtor's net take home pay, (i.e. gross pay less statutorily mandated deductions). A calculation, that takes 25% of disposable income and minimum wage into consideration, determines the correct garnishment amount (see Title 12, Chapter 9, Article 4.1 12-1598.16 for the exact calculation. Garnishment can occur only after the person being garnished has received a 10-day's notice.

However, under Arizona Title 12, Chapter 5.1, Article 2 12-592, periodic installments for future damages for loss of earnings or loss of support for beneficiaries of a judgment entered in a wrongful death action are exempt from garnishment, attachment, execution and any other process or claim to the extent wages or earnings are exempt under any applicable law. Periodic installments for all other future damages are exempt under garnishment, attachment, execution and any other process or claim except to the extent they may be assigned pursuant to section 12-591.

If you reside in another state, see Advice on Judgment Garnishment to learn more about wage garnishment.

Levy Bank Accounts

A levy means that the creditor has the right to take money in a debtor's account and apply the funds to the balance of the judgment. Again, the procedure for levying bank accounts, as well as what amount, if any, a debtor can claim as exempt from the levy, is governed by state law. Many states exempt certain amounts and certain types of funds from bank levies, so a debtor should review his or her state's laws to find if a bank account can be levied. Some states call levy attachment or garnishment.

In Arizona, levy for family support is allowed under Arizona Title 25, Chapter 5, Article 1 25-521. If there is a court-ordered judgment or if the obligor is in arrears in an amount equal to twelve months of support, the department may issue a levy and collect the amount owed by the obligor by levy on all property and rights to property not exempt under federal or state law.

Arizona levy laws are also found in Title 23, Chapter 4, Article 5 23-752, and 23-755. What Arizona calls its levy law covers what other states consider garnishment. Personal property and wages can be seized under Arizona Title 23, Chapter 4, Article 5.

Lien

A lien is an encumbrance -- a claim -- on a property. For example, if the debtor owns a home, a creditor with a judgment has the right to place a lien on the home, meaning that if the debtor sells or refinances the home, the debtor will be required to pay the judgment out of the proceeds of the sale or refinance. If the amount of the judgment is more than the amount of equity in your home, then the lien may prevent the debtor from selling or refinancing until the debtor can pay off the judgment.

Under Arizona Title 33, Chapter 7, Article 5 33-964, a judgment shall become a lien for a period of five years from the date it is given, on all real property of the judgment debtor except real property exempt from execution, including homestead property, in the county in which the judgment is recorded, whether the property is then owned by the judgment debtor or is later acquired. A judgment lien for support, as defined in section 25-500, remains in effect until satisfied or lifted.

Statute of Limitations

Each state has is own statute of limitations. Arizona law regarding consumer accounts is found in Title 12, Chapter 5, Article 3. The statute of limitations for open accounts (credit cards) and oral contracts is three years (12-543), and written contracts is six years (12-546).

Arizona Title 47 contains three references to statutes of limitations relating to property:

  • Default Under a Lease Contract, must be commenced within four years after the cause of action accrued. See Chapter 2A, Article 5 47-2A506.
  • Breach of any Contract for Sale, must be commenced within four years after the cause of action has accrued. See Chapter 2, Article 7 47-2725.
  • Taxpayer's obligations for any tax, interest or penalty required to be collected by the department for any tax period are extinguished, if not previously satisfied, six years after the amount of tax determined to be due becomes final unless extenuating circumstances apply. See Title 42, Chapter 2, Article 2 42-2066.

Regarding judgments, a judgment-creditor has 5 years to enforce a judgment unless the judgment is renewed. See § 12-1551(B). A judgment may be renewed by filing an action to enforce the judgment or by filing an affidavit with the court within 90 days before the expiration of the 5-year period. See § 12-1611 and § 12-1612.

Arizona Foreclosure

Arizona foreclosure laws are found in Title 33, Chapter 6, Article 2.

Under Arizona law, a lender may be prevented from suing the borrower for the deficiency following a foreclosure. However, Arizona's anti-deficiency laws are tricky. Under Arizona 33-814, a homeowner is liable for a deficiency judgment if they have not resided in their home for six consecutive months. A deficiency on a purchase-money mortgage is not allowed on residential property if a single one-family or single two-family dwelling that is on 2.5 acres or less (33-814G). The Arizona anti-deficiency laws apply to second mortgages and deeds of trust if they are purchase money loans (Baker v. Gardner, 160 Ariz. at 104, 770 P.2d; and Ross Realty Co. v. First Citizens Bank & Trust, 296 N.C. 366, 250 S.E.2d 271, 275 (1979); and Nydam v. Crawford, 181 Ariz. 101, 887 P.2d 631 (App. 1994))A deficiency is allowed if the value of the house has declined because the homeowner has committed waste (33-814A).  Consult with an Arizona attorney with experience in property law to understand your rights and liabilities in your situation.

Recommendation

Consult with an Arizona attorney experienced in civil litigation to get precise answers to your questions about liens, levies, and garnishment in Arizona.

I hope this information helps you Find. Learn & Save.

Best,

Bill

Bills.com

Comments (79)


Carmen H.
Phoenix, AZ  |  April 01, 2012
I defaulted on my school loan of $11,000. The creditor (through a judgment) has been receiving payments (garnishment) for 4 1/2 years. I have $9,000 but now the creditor said the $9,000 was fees and interest and I can't be released from the garnishment until I pay $11,000 principle. Can they do this?
Mark P.
Glendale, AZ  |  March 07, 2012
My Father received a court judgement on $6,500 credit card debt by a law firm. He acquired the debt from health issues some years ago and his only income is social security and a very small pension. As I understand it wage garnishment is not allowed on those incomes but can the court order a garnishment of his bank account? He has no savings and no money left over each month after bills and expenses. Also, my Father and I co-own the home we live in; can the court order a lien on our house? He has no car and no real assets besides some furniture. He is an 86 year old veteran. We live in Arizona. Thank you.
Bills.com
March 07, 2012
In most states, a judgment-creditor for credit card debt has three remedies:
  • Wage garnishment
  • Account levy
  • Lien on property

Let us look at each for a retired person who owns real property.

Federal law prevents garnishment of Social Security benefits. Social Security benefits deposited into an account are protected, too, if the account contains only Social Security funds. Ask your bank or credit union to place a notation on the account that it contains money from the Social Security Administration. Most states protect pensions from garnishment.

A levy is possible for account containing non-Social Security funds, or accounts that contain funds from Social Security and another source.

A judgment-creditor can obtain a lien on property titled in the judgment-debtor's name.

Here, you mentioned your father is on the title to the home. Therefore, the property is at risk for having a lien is filed against it. A lien will encumber the property, making the lien an issue when you want to refinance or sell the property.

Curtis L.
February 20, 2012
We are looking to do a refi next month under HARP 2.0. Currently, I am pretty sure we have a non-recourse loan here in Arizona. What I would like to know is if we will still have a non-recourse loan once we refi or if it will become a recourse loan. Does that status change whether we are living in the home or renting it?
Bills.com
February 23, 2012
It is quite probable that if your current loan falls under the anti-deficiency laws, and it is a purchase money loan, then the new HARP loan will also qualify as a non-recourse loan. However, since the Arizona anti-deficiency laws are complicated, and open to some interpretation, I recommend that you speak with an Arizona lawyer. You want to be 100% certain about the recourse/non-recourse issue, before you refinance.
Ernesto H.
Phoenix, AZ  |  February 11, 2012
We bought our first house about 4 years ago, and the payment was to high and could no longer afford it. We lived in the house for a year. I tried to get it lowered but was not successfull. We had to walk away from the house. They recently started garnishinmg my paychecks and took my irs refund. Can they do that on your first house?
Bills.com
February 13, 2012
As the article stated, anti-deficiency laws can be tricky. Consult with an Arizona attorney with experience in property law to understand your rights and liabilities in your situation.
Allen C.
Mesa, AZ  |  January 24, 2012
Hello, I recently ran my 3 free credit reports in an attempt to start paying down some of my past indiscretions and mistakes. In less than a week now I have received several calls from collectors that have my current information now and made plans to help pay off my debts. However, I just (minutes ago) got off the phone with an Attorney's office that called and didn't give me the mini or recorded miranda (i used to be a collector) when I called them on it the man told me they would pursue legal actions then and hung up. I called back in order to find out why I deserved the bad treatment for asking a simple question and he said it was a The Attorney Office of R.L. Bernadheli (sic) and that he was calling on a $1200.00 Sears credit card that was charged off in 2004. I know the AZ statute of limitations is 6 years so I think I'm correct in thinking this is past it's statute and that I don't have to worry about it. I requested the information sent to my PO Box so I can dispute the debt, he told me it was coming to my residence "Good luck deadbeat" and hung up... I am very upset and would like to know what I should do next.
Bills.com
January 25, 2012
That was a smart move to get your three free credit reports. Remember to monitor your credit files regularly. You should expect professional and courteous treatment by anyone giving you service. A creditor or collection agency is obliged to treat you in a fair manner, without threats. Read the Bills.com article about the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act. You will find information about filing a complaint there.

Under the FDCPA, when you receive communication from the collection agency about a debt, you have 30 days to ask for a debt validation. Read the Bills.com article about validating a debt. Even if the statute of limitations has expired, you may still be sued in most states. If that happens, you may raise the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense.
Craig M.
Phoenix, AZ  |  October 21, 2011
I received a wage garnishment notice in the mail for an employee who works for me. On the page where it shows that the Plaintiff was granted Judgement, it mentions Accrued interest from 1/28/2004 - 4/21/2009. Does this mean the debt is over 6 years old, and that it is beyond any Statute of Limitation? We are located in Arizona. Any advice here would be appreciated.
Bills.com
October 23, 2011
Once the judgment was granted, a different type of statute of limitations applies, the one that governs for how long a judgment remains valid. In Arizona, a judgment is valid for five years, but can be renewed, if the judgment-creditor takes the proper steps.

You or your employee could choose to look into whether this old judgment was renewed properly. Hiring an attorney to look into that is one option.

It is legal for interest to accrue on a debt post-judgment, as long as it is charged at the rate allowed by Arizona law.
Steve K.
October 13, 2011
A friend of mine is owed on a Deed of Trust, which the Trustor has not paid on since September 2007. is there a statute of limitations on her starting a trustee's sale?
Bills.com
October 14, 2011
Impossible for me to answer your question without learning more facts. Tell your friend to consult with a lawyer in his or her state with remedies law experience to learn what his or her rights are regarding the debt.
Tim B.
Tempe, AZ  |  September 14, 2011
I have a line of credit with Bank of America. In February they sent me a letter that said they were changing the terms of my line and that the entire amount would be due and payable in 12 months. Since I owed $50,000 on the line I spoke with the bank and said it was not possible to repay that amount in such a short time. I have been negotiating a settlement with them since May, but we do not agree on the amount. Last week the bank siezed $6,000 in various accounts I had at the bank including accounts of my children that I was also listed on. My current past due amount was only about $900. What is my recourse, if any. I am afraid it will cost more to hire an attorney than what I could recover.
Bills.com
September 14, 2011
You have one option if you wish to address the injustice you described — hire a lawyer who has experience litigating contracts or real property law.
Corinna L.
September 12, 2011
Hello bill i live in Arizona and i was given a summons and was required to file with the court and serve upon the plaintiffs attorney an answer to the complaint. Well my question to you is after i went to the court to find out what i was suppose to do they told me i had to file a blank title page and answer the question on the summons so what exactly do i do and what will happen to me after this??? My car was repossed in 2008 and there is no way i can afford to pay back the loan so can they garnish my wages???
Bills.com
September 12, 2011
Court clerks may not offer legal advice, or otherwise help anyone complete a legal document. Bite the bullet and hire a lawyer to help you answer the summons and complaint adequately. If you cannot afford a lawyer, see the Legal Services Corp.-Funded Programs Web page to find an organization in your area that provides legal services for people with low or no income.
Avatar
Corinna L.
September 12, 2011
So what will happen if i dont file the blank title page???
Bills.com
September 12, 2011
I confess I do not know what a "blank title page" is under Arizona or any other state law. Consult with a Arizona lawyer who has civil litigation or consumer law to learn how to respond to the summons and complaint adequately.
Avatar
Corinna L.
September 13, 2011
What will happen if i dont respond to the summons within the 20 days??
Kay M.
Globe, AZ  |  September 09, 2011
There is a collection agency calling where I work. Isn't there a law against that?
Bills.com
September 12, 2011
You can request the creditor cease contacting you at your place of work. See the Bills.com Debt Do It Yourself page to see a sample letter that makes this request.
Avatar
Kay M.
Globe, AZ  |  September 12, 2011
This issue is for another employee, as the secretary, I answer the phones. I told the creditor not to call again, since it wasn't related to our business and he got intensely beligerant and abusive and wanted to talk to my boss (who was gone for the day).
Bills.com
September 12, 2011
Explain you are happy and eager to provide customers and potential clients excellent service, but since the collection agent's call is not related to your employer's business, you are under no obligation to continue with their call. State that if they call again, you will bring the call to the attention of your firm's legal counsel. Hang up. If the calls persist, gather all of the information you can about the caller, including his or her name, address, employer, and so on, and forward the information you gather to your employer's legal counsel.
Avatar
Kay M.
Globe, AZ  |  September 12, 2011
Thx, that sounds pretty much like what I thought, and I will do that if I hear from this caller or his company again. I looked them up on the internet, apparently they have a rep for being obnoxious, so he was just following a company standard.
Waiting for comments to load Loading more comments
Thanks for your feedback!
 
Thank you for subscribing!