California Collection Laws

What are California's laws regarding wage garnishment, levy, lien, foreclosure, and payday loans?

Read full question
Bill's Answer: Answered by Mark Cappel

A collection agent or law firm that owns a collection account is a creditor. A creditor has several legal means of collecting a debt. But before the creditor can start, the creditor must go to court to receive a judgment. See the Bills.com resource Served Summons and Complaint to learn more about this process.

The court may decide to grant a judgment to the creditor. A judgment is a declaration by a court that the creditor has the legal right to demand a wage garnishment, a levy on the debtor’s bank accounts, and a lien on the debtor’s property. A creditor that is granted a judgment is called a “judgment-creditor.” Which of these tools the creditor will use depends on the circumstances. We discuss each of these remedies below.

In California, the following cited laws are found under the Code of Civil Procedure unless specified.

Wage Garnishment

The most common method used by judgment-creditors to enforce judgments is wage garnishment, in which a judgment creditor would contact the debtor’s employer and require the employer to deduct a certain portion of the debtor’s wages each pay period and send the money to the creditor. However, several states, including Texas, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and South Carolina, do not allow wage garnishment for the enforcement of most judgments. In several other states, such as New Hampshire, wage garnishment is not the “preferred” method of judgment enforcement because, although possible, it is a tedious and time consuming process for creditors.

In most states, creditors are allowed to garnish between 10% and 25% of your wages, with the percentage allowed being determined by each state.

California’s Garnishment rules are found in Section 706.010-706.011. In general, California follows the federal rules for the amount of a garnishment, which allows up to 25% of a worker’s wages to be garnished. For exemptions, California Section 706.05 and Section 703.010-703.150 defines earnings and what is considered exempt. Municipal and state employees may be garnished. See the Bills.com resource California Wage Garnishment additional discussion on wage garnishment.

See the Dept. of Labor’s Employment Law Guide - Wage Garnishment and the Dept. of the Treasury's Answers About Garnishments.

Garnishment of Social Security benefits or pensions for consumer debt is not allowed under federal law. Garnishment of Social Security and pensions may be allowed for child support.

Generally speaking, 401(K) or other retirement funds are exempt from garnishment. It is advisable to have those funds deposited into a separate bank account if you are concerned about garnishment on those benefits.

If you reside in another state, see the Bills.com Wage Garnishment article to learn more.

Levy Financial Accounts

A levy means that the creditor has the right to take whatever money in a debtor’s account and apply the funds to the balance of the judgment. Again, the procedure for levying bank accounts, as well as what amount, if any, a debtor can claim as exempt from the levy, is governed by state law. Many states exempt certain amounts and certain types of funds from bank levies, so a debtor should review his or her state's laws to find if a bank account can be levied. In some states levy is called attachment or account garnishment. The names may vary but the concept is the same.

In California, a levy or attachment, is allowed under Section 699.510-699.560. Levy is allowed if the plaintiff possesses a legal instrument known a writ commanding the levying officer to seize and sell as much of a debtor’s property as is necessary to satisfy a creditor’s claim. See Section 700.010-700.200 for specifics.

If you reside in another state, see the Bills.com Account Levy resource to learn more about the general rules for this remedy.

Lien

A lien is an encumbrance — a claim — on a property. For example, if the debtor owns a home, a creditor with a judgment has the right to place a lien on the home, meaning that if the debtor sells or refinance the home, the debtor will be required to pay the judgment out of the proceeds of the sale or refinance. If the amount of the judgment is more than the amount of equity in your home, then the lien may prevent the debtor from selling or refinancing until the debtor can pay the judgment.

California allows a lien for a money judgment. Under Section 697.510-697.670, mechanics and contractors (and similar laborers and professionals) have the right to place a lien on real property (697.310 through 697.410) or personal property (697.510 through 697.670). This also includes creditors for unsecured debt (credit cards, auto loans, et cetera), see Civil Procedure Code Section 697.010-697.060. Exemptions are covered under Section 704.010-704.210. A lienholder on a residence may not foreclose. However, if a lienholder of personal property may demand the sheriff seize the property and auction it to satisfy the lien.

If you reside in another state, see the Bills.com Liens & How to Resolve Them article to learn more.

Writ of Replevin

Replevin means an action for recovering goods wrongfully taken or detained. Four California statutes cover replevin. One concerns the recovery of public records from a private party. A second concerns recovery of property before the commencement of civil litigation (Civil Procedure Section 512.010). A third concerns a post-judgment writ of possession (Section 712.010), and the fourth concerns the repossession of a manufactured home, a mobile home or real property (Sections 1166a, and 712.010 et. seq.). The fourth is usually applied when a landlord seeks to eject a tenant from a property.

California Statutes of Limitations

Each state has is own statute of limitations. Under California law, the statute of limitations is governed by Section 335-349.4. The statute of limitations on an open account (i.e., credit card) is four years, written contracts four years, real property actions five years, foreign judgments are valid for ten years, and domestic judgments are valid for ten years (and can be renewed at ten years).

California Foreclosure

For information on California foreclosures, see Bills.com article Is My HELOC a Recourse or Non-Recourse Loan in California? for a discussion of the differences between recourse and non-recourse loans. See also Mortgage Debt and Community Property to learn how California’s community property laws affect foreclosure.

California foreclosure laws are found in Civil Code Section 2920-2944.7. To learn more about the rules surrounding foreclosure in this state, including deficiency balances see CP Section 580d and Section 2938(e)(3).

California Payday Loan Collection

See the Bills.com resource Payday Loans to learn how California Civil Code Section 1789.30-1789.38, and specifically Section 1789.33, protects consumers of payday loans. Defaulting on a payday loan is not a crime in California, and collection agents suggesting the contrary are misinformed.

California Repossession Rules

The repossession agency must notify the borrower by mail or in person within 48 hours after repossessing a vehicle.

The seller or holder must give 15 days’ notice of intent to sell a repossessed vehicle to all persons liable on the contract (CC §2983.2(a)), except when the vehicle was seized by a public agency, such as a car seized by the police for transporting illegal drugs (CC §2983.3(b)(6)).

The notice of intent to dispose of a repossessed vehicle must advise all persons liable on the contract of their rights to redeem the vehicle, reinstate the contract, request a 10-day extension of the redemption and reinstatement periods, and request a written accounting of the disposition, and must give notice of the borrower’s possible liability for a deficiency judgment. (CC §2983.2(a)(1)–(9)). The seller must provide a full accounting for the disposition of the vehicle to any person liable on the contract on written request or if there is a surplus. (CC §2983.2(b)–(c))

Recommendation

Consult with a California attorney experienced in civil litigation to get precise answers to your questions about liens, levies, and garnishment in California. See also the State of California Dept. of Consumer Affairs document Collecting or Satisfying the Judgment for more information about California’s collection laws.

I hope this information helps you Find. Learn & Save.

Best,

Bill

Bills.com

Rate this article
Not helpful
Awesome

Comments (66)


Luis T.
Anaheim, CA  |  November 29, 2012
Im a bit confused as to how much can be garnished from California residents? I was employed with a company who did their own book keeping and was being garnished for child support $369.00 bi weekly and debt 0f $11,000.00 that was paid off in a little over a year. I was making $15.00 an hour with 40 hour weeks and my take home pay was $436.00 bi weekly?? I addressed the issue with supervisor/owner/book keeper and she stated that per California state law two places can garnish from my check at the same time up to 75%??? Is this information correct, please help thanks.
Bills.com
November 29, 2012
Your employer is wrong, wrong, wrong, unless the garnishments are related to delinquent child support payments or tax debt.

If your wage garnishments are related to child support, then up to 60% of your wages can be garnished. Child support-related wage garnishments have priority over other wage garnishments. In other words, they immediately go to the front of the line if there are other wage garnishments in effect.

Let us assume for the sake of argument the two wage garnishments were from judgment creditors, and were not related to child support or taxes. Under federal law (the Consumer Credit Protection Act Title 3) and California statute (CCP § 706 et seq.) only the amount greater than $217.50 per week may be garnished where the disposable earnings are $290 per week or less. You mentioned your take-home pay (which the law calls "disposable earnings") is $436 every two weeks. I will assume you work about the same number of hours per week. According to my math, your disposable earnings are $218 per week. This means $1 per pay period can be garnished from your pay check.

Acquaint your employer's payroll person with Wage Garnishment: A Guide to Understanding Court-Ordered Wage Garnishment and Your Options to understand California's rules, and the Dept. of Labor's The Federal Wage Garnishment Law, Consumer Credit Protection Act's Title 3 (PDF) to learn the federal rules.
Jack W.
Brooklyn, NY  |  October 16, 2012
Is it safe for someone with severe debt to purchase property in their own name? I have some $50,000 in debt which has been delinquent over 4 years now. It's mostly from credit cards but there is some student loans, medical and misc. All of the debt was accrued in California, though I currently reside and work out of state. According to my credit report there was a judgment filed for $25k in Dec of 2008 by a credit card company and there are five different collection agencies listed who have made "Account Review Inquiries" as recently as yesterday. That said, I've never actually been bothered by creditors, possibly because I didn't fill out a W-2 for several years or because my mailing address and phone number was inconsistent. Now... I'd like to purchase a small piece of vacant land (not in California) and I'm concerned that if I put my name on the deed someone will come after it. The full market value of the property is listed at $6,700 but the selling price would be over $20,000. There would also be another name on the deed. Could a collection agency put a lien on the property if my name is on the deed? How would that work? Are they likely to do so for property valued at that amount? Thanks ahead of time for your help. The service you provide here is invaluable. Not only is the information clear and thorough, it is very comforting. Your tone isn't judgmental or condescending, which is a huge relief when dealing with an issue that often carries such shame. Thank you, Bill. z/s
Bills.com
October 16, 2012
I can't give you legal advice, as only an attorney can properly do so, but I will share a few thoughts.

A creditor with a judgment against you could obtain a lien that would encumber the property you buy. If they become aware of your ownership, through some public records search, for instance, it seems reasonable to expect a lien to be filed.
Alex M.
San Diego, CA  |  May 18, 2012
I recently found out that there was a lawsuit and lien judgement against me in Los Angeles for a credit debt. However, I was never served and did not go to court because I was unware of the suit. Additionally, this debt was about to exceed the california statute of limitations, so the attorney office representing the original credit company submitted the suit right before the SOL. I would like to buy a home now. Does this lien affect the purchase of a home in Los Angeles? Or would I only be affected if I tried to resell the home?
Avatar
Tiffany P.
Perris, CA  |  May 18, 2012
I only know this because I talked to about 5-10 different lenders and if you have a public record on your credit file you will not be able to get a loan for a home. My husband had a judgement against him and it was reported on only one of his credit reports and we weren't able to get financed (we live in So Cal) so luckily for us his fell off after the ten years and they didn't renew it. But the lenders we talked said we would have had to pay it and then go through the courts to get it show as paid. Hope this helps :)
Bills.com
May 22, 2012
The company was within its rights to file suit against you before the SOL expired. In fact, in most states a creditor can even sue you after the SOL has passed, though you can use the SOL as an affirmative defense. In your situation, the lawsuit being filed before the SOL expired negates you using the SOL to protect yourself.

This matter could be a big problem for purchasing a home, depending on when the judgment shows up on your credit report and how the debt is now reported. As things currently stand, you may have to pay off the collections account to qualify for a mortgage loan, depending on the size of the debt and its age. If it goes to the point where a judgment appears, it is almost certain that lenders would require you to satisfy the debt before they would approve your application. You also want to avoid a judgment, if possible, to avoid the harm it will cause to your credit score.
Kimberley H.
San Lorenzo, CA  |  January 29, 2012
We purchased our home in 1992 for $189450. Right now after 19 yrs its valued at $285000. At the time of the crash when people lost jobs and homes, my husband lost his job and I became disabled. Our payments then where $2080.00 Plus and equity line or $75000 at $400.00. Needless to say we could not pay either one. So for the next year and half we made no payments to either one. My husband found a job. We tried working out a mod with the second loan, they would not do it. BOA was willing to,so after 3 years we have a modified loan at $1437.00 a month. BoA took the 13 or 14 mo we didnt pay and added them to our loan, at a 40 yrs, at 3%. As for the Equity line,Citibank,by now it was with a collection compay, continually adding interest and late charges everymonth with the total now at $87000! They refuse to take anything less than $300 a month(we cant do it) My question is...are they allowed to keep adding interest and late charges once it goes to a collection agency? Is there a statue of limitations on collections of this loan? My fear is, I really dont know if we will ever be abel to pay it, I had to retire, his job is much less than the one that closed up. We barely make ends meet, how can we meet all of our obligations?
Bills.com
January 30, 2012
Most likely the loan was called in and late charges and rates were taken on the full balance of the loan. Regarding the legality of the charges on your home equity loan, you will need to refer to your loan agreement versus the statements sent to you. The collection agency will be able to charge interest rates, pursuant to your agreement, but not more than allowed by state law. The $300 charge most likely covers interest only. The creditor is not interested in a negative amortization. Since you already lowered your first mortgage to the lowest available limit, there is not much left to do in terms of lowering your mortgage payments. Since it sounds as if you have positive equity in the house, your best solution, may be to negotiate a lower pay off with the creditor, and sell the house.
Jason T.
San Diego, CA  |  January 24, 2012
My brother and I owned a condo in Florida. We currently reside in California. Due to our financial situation, we were forced to quit making payments on our HOAs and our mortgage for our FL property (that was for 2 years our primary residence), in order to pay for food and other life necessities. We sold our property in a short sale in January 2011. Our first and second mortgage lender wrote off our loan balance. The HOA association was paid approximately 1/3 of the balance of unpaid HOA dues at closing of the short sale. Our real estate agent, that facilitated the short sale for us, represented to us multiple times via email and calls that he "got the HOA to settle for the what we paid them at closing". We can forward email chains with the agent for verification of the fact that we understood the payment to be a settlement in full. However, fast forward to now and the HOA is claiming that they gave our agent an estoppel letter during the short sale that says that the money paid to them at closing is only to allow the property to sell for the short sale (basically we're paying them off so they'll release their claim on the property to let it sell on the short sale) and now they are asking us to pay them the entire balance of delinquent dues. We were never shown the estoppel letter, never agreed to it and never signed it. Given it's ridiculous assumption (i.e that nothing paid at closing would be a credit and that this is not a full settlement) we would never have agreed to it, had it been shown to us. Furthermore, in May of this year, the court filed a notice "Dismissing Case, Cancelling Foreclosure Sale, Cancelling Notice of Lis Pendens, Setting Aside Final Summary Judgment and directing Clerk to return original loan documents and to substitute photostatic copies in the court file- hereby dismissed, cancelled, set aside directed and substituted. Clerk Close File." We feel that there is no merit whatsoever to the HOA's claim that we owe them money, that we fully settled at closing and furthermore, the judge dismissed any outstanding claim they make think they have against us. We'd like to know if we have anything to worry about and if so, how to protect ourselves from the HOA association (which is based in Florida) trying to come after us as California residents. Thanks in advance for your assistance and advice. It is greatly appreciated.
Bills.com
January 25, 2012
I cannot estimate your liability without reading the HOA's letter sent to the real estate agent, or the notice you mentioned that the court filed. Your safest course of action is to hire a Florida lawyer to research the issues you mentioned, including locating the crucial HOA's letter to your agent.
Diana P.
San Diego, CA  |  January 13, 2012
My dad, 56 yrs old just passed away and had a $250,000 life insurance. My mom is the beneficiary. There are 3 kids including myself and we are all over 18. My moms wants to file for bankruptcy because they were in a lot of debt and foreclosed on their home. Is this money protected from creditors? Would she be better off giving me the insurance money and just paying the taxes on it-rather than losing it to pay for creditors. She ultimately wants the money to give to me and my siblings. Help!  We are in California.
Bills.com
January 13, 2012
Before your family starts gifting any insurance benefits or taking other financial actions to avoid the decedent's creditors, consult with a California lawyer who has probate experience. With the understanding that I know nothing about the decedent's estate, your mother may have zero liability for your father's debts. On the other hand, she may have liability for some debts, and not others. A probate lawyer will answer your questions, including if bankruptcy is a smart option.
Daniel C.
Fontana, CA  |  December 27, 2011
My wife has medical bills in excess of $30,000 from our first daughter being born in 2005. his still shows on her credit report but to date she has not been sued and it appears several different collection agencies have attempted to collect. Since it has been 6 years, the first step would be to dispute this on her credit report? or to send a letter to the collection agencie(s) that the SOL is up and to stop sending these letters? what to do?
Bills.com
December 27, 2011
I recommend that you the read Bills.com article about medical bills in California and statute of limitations. A derogatory item will stay on your credit report for 7.5 years from the date of first delinquency. This is not an indication that the SOL is valid. Even if the SOL has expired, the creditor can still pursue a court judgment, and you will have to claim that the SOL has expired as an affirmative defense. The SOL does not begin to run when the debt was first created, but when the last payment was made. In some states, a SOL can be reset when some other event occurs, such as acknowledging the debt. I do not recommend contacting the collection agency, except through a debt validation letter.

Since you are dealing with a large sum of money, I recommend that you speak with a local attorney to help determine the validity of the debt and the SOL.
Mdoc Y.
December 05, 2011
Hello. I just got a letter from a law firm regarding a debt. I was thinking the SOL has passed, but I checked my credit report and it states that that particular credit card was 30 days overdue Feb 2008. So I'm just shy of the 4 year mark (I reside in California). My question is what I should do as of now. Should I submit a DV? If so should I wait til the 30 days nears? Or should I not send one and just sit tight and cross my fingers? From the document, it is a collection agency that hired this firm and not the original creditor who I borrowed from. Thanks.
Bills.com
December 05, 2011
First, look at your own records to learn when you can prove to a court when the date of first delinquency took place. Why? The information published by the consumer credit reporting agency may be incorrectly reported by the collection agent or original creditor either though accident or design.

Second, by all means validate the debt. As you mentioned, you have 30 days after notification of the first collection notice to request validation. There is no down-side for a consumer to validate a debt. The upside, on the other hand, is tremendous if the collection agent cannot validate the debt.

Bakersfield, CA  |  November 20, 2011
Hello! I made a loan to an associate in 2009. Payments on the loan were to have begun in January 2010, but to date, only $1240 has been paid. I am in the process of drafting a Letter of Demand in order to begin legal processes against the person I loaned the money to. Under the terms of the promissory note, the loan was guaranteed with property - specifically restaurant equipment. Unfortunately, the person I made the loan to has now sold the business, so the equipment is no longer in his possession. I would like to start looking at placing a lien on the equipment or at garnishing the payments the new owner's payments to the person I made the loan to. Is there a process I can begin personally, or is contacting an attorney my next best step? My thanks for your assistance!
Bills.com
November 21, 2011
While there is nothing legally preventing you from suing your associate on your own, I strongly recommend that you seek legal help, if the total debt is greater than the small claims cut-off in your state.
Avatar
Amber C.
Bakersfield, CA  |  November 21, 2011
The original loan amount is well over the California small claims cut off. Thank you. I will seek counsel.
Vanessa M.
San Diego, CA  |  November 10, 2011
Hi, my boyfriend has been receiving a number of calls regarding a car loan he had back in 2000. The car was actually forfeited back to the credit company by his grandmother (his co-signer) because he was no longer able to make the payments. There seems to have been a law suit on them both in 2003 but he never heard of anything until now. They are threatening to garnish his wages if he does not come to some agreement. Is the statue of limitations over? How can he avoid them garnishing his wages?
Bills.com
November 10, 2011
Your statement "...seems to have been a law suit on them both in 2003..." gives me pause. Does the creditor have a judgment against your friend? Your friend's credit report may offer a clue if the judgment (assuming it exists) was reported to the consumer credit reporting agencies (the credit bureaus). If the judgment appears on his credit report, then there is part of your answer. If the judgment does not appear, then it may exist but was never reported.

Assuming your friend is a California judgment-debtor, then the statute of limitations for a judgment is 10 years. Consult with a lawyer who has consumer law experience to learn more specifics about your friend's rights and liabilities.
Avatar
Vanessa M.
San Diego, CA  |  November 10, 2011
I checked on our city court site and it shows that they (friend and grandmother) had a civil suit against them in 2003. I am not sure if his grandmother was aware of it, but he was not and has never been contacted until now. I have checked his credit report and there is no mention of that creditor there. Also, if he were to file bankruptcy would it clear this issue up as well?
Bills.com
November 10, 2011
A lawsuit and a judgment are two different things. A lawsuit can be dismissed, or go to trial. If there is a trial, the court may find in favor of the plaintiff or the defendant, or dismiss the case altogether. If a creditor files breach of contract case against a defendant and wins, the court may award the plaintiff a judgment. With the judgment in hand, the creditor can use one of the remedies allowed by the state, and can include a wage garnishment, account levy, or lien. Therefore, the key issue the defendants need to learn is whether the creditor obtained a judgment against them.

Bankruptcy is a strong tool, but it is not the only one in a lawyer's toolbox. Bankruptcy can wipe out some judgments, but not all. Consult with a lawyer who has bankruptcy experience to learn if the parties have a judgment, and if bankruptcy is the right tool.
Waiting for comments to load Loading more comments
Thanks for your feedback!
 

Tool Box   Easy to use resources to help you find solutions to your money questions

Thank you for subscribing!