California is a "community property" state, which means that many assets and obligations of one spouse acquired during the marriage become "community" assets or obligations. Generally speaking, this can mean that one spouse can be held liable for the debts of the other spouse even if his or her name was not on the account which resulted in the debt. However, even in a community property state, one spouse has the ability to create "non-community" assets and obligations. Generally speaking, for a debt to be considered community property, the debt must have been incurred to benefit the community; for example, if the debt were incurred to purchase items for the marital home, it would likely be considered community debt. However, if the debt were incurred to purchase a boat which one spouse never used and which was kept separate from other community assets, the debt may not be considered community debt, and the non-debtor spouse may therefore not be liable.
It is possible that your spouse’s creditors could name you as a co-defendant in any lawsuits they bring against your spouse to collect on these debts; if they obtain a judgment against you, they may be able to garnish your wages, levy your bank accounts, and/or place liens on your property. However, if you think that this debt does not qualify as community debt, you could challenge your liability in court and may be able to avoid a judgment being entered against you. Also, in most community property states, I have not seen creditors file suit against the spouses of credit card holders as a matter of course, so your wife's creditors may not even file suit against you if they do decide to pursue legal action against her. Unfortunately, they do have the legal ability to sue you, so you should be prepared in case a suit is filed against you.
I would encourage you to consult with an attorney to discuss your potential liability in this case and what steps you can take to protect yourself. To read more about community property in general, you can visit Wikipedia's Community property Web page.
In a worst-case scenario, if your wife’s creditors do come after you for the payment of these debts, you may have no choice but to file for bankruptcy protection yourself. I would recommend that you and your wife to consult with an experienced bankruptcy attorney licensed to practice law in California. While a consumer’s ability to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection is usually based on his or her household income, which in your case would likely disqualify your wife from filing Chapter 7 bankruptcy, there are some situations in which a spouse can file for protection excluding the other spouse’s income. Unfortunately, I do not know enough about your financial circumstances to tell you what options are available to you and your wife in bankruptcy.
If, after consulting with a bankruptcy attorney, you determine your wife qualifies to file for bankruptcy protection, that would likely be the easiest solution to resolving such a large amount of debt. If you would like to read more about bankruptcy, I encourage you to visit the Bills.com Bankruptcy page.
Even if your wife cannot file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which should discharge all of these credit cards debts, she may be able to file for Chapter 13 bankruptcy protection, which would allow her to establish a repayment arrangement with her creditors. Chapter 13 payments are also usually based on one’s household income, but this requirement does not apply to all situations, so you should again consult with a bankruptcy attorney to discuss the options available to you.
For more information for consumers struggling with debt, I encourage you to visit the Bills.com Debt Help page. I hope this information helps you Find. Learn & Save.
Best,
Bill
Belleair, FL | February 10, 2012
February 10, 2012
Please see the Bills.com Florida Collection Laws page, which is tailored to Florida residents with debt-related questions. See also Served Summons and Complaint for a general discussion of how a person should respond to a summons. Please ask any follow-up questions you may have on one of those two pages.
Redwood City, CA | January 14, 2012
January 21, 2012
I realize my answer here does not answer your question. I am not answering your question because I want you to consult with a lawyer in your state who has either contract law or family law experience. He or she will analyze the facts of your case, and apply your facts to relevant case law on that issue.
"Smell tests" are a bit of legal slang that slips into legal decisions. It is shorthand for, "The judge will know it when he or she sees it."
Rockville, MD | September 25, 2011
September 25, 2011
Consult with an attorney if you want an authoritative answer.
Los Angeles, CA | April 23, 2011
April 25, 2011
November 29, 2010
November 30, 2010
May 23, 2010
March 29, 2010
March 29, 2010
March 17, 2010
December 28, 2009
Loading more commentsSince you don't have facebook, please provide us with your location and a valid email address so we can answer it. Without a valid email address,we can't reply. (Go back to login with Facebook)
Due to the high volume of comments received, we cannot publish and/or respond to every comment received. If you have a specific question, we recommend you search our site for an answer before commenting.
* Bills.com will not share, sell, lend, or make public your e-mail address. We reserve the right to delete any questions or comments that violate the Bills.com terms of service.
We get a lot of comments! To help us show our boss that this is a valuable service, so we can keep providing it, we ask you to do 2 things before commmenting:
Log in
Like us
Submit your comment!
Due to the high volume of comments received, we cannot publish and/or respond to every comment received. If you have a specific question, we recommend you search our site for an answer before commenting.
* Bills.com will not share, sell, lend, or make public your e-mail address. We reserve the right to delete any questions or comments that violate the Bills.com terms of service.
Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be posted shortly.
Comments (27)